SALAH GUNA KUASA Guru sekolah agama dipaksa hadir majlis Muhyiddin

Guru sekolah agama dipaksa hadir majlis Muhyiddin

LAIN PULA DI NEGERI SEMBILAN KERANA TAKUTKAN BERSIH GURU DI NEGERI SEMBILAN MUHYIDIN ARAHKAN PADA 9 JULAI INI ANJURKAN MINGGU KECERDASAN HANYA UNTUK PASTIKAN GURU TIDAK HADIR KE HIMPUNAN BERSEH.

KHABARNYA LAGI SEMUA PROGREM DIBATALKAN HANYA UNTUK MENYAMBUT MUHYIDIN. GURU MULA MERUNGUT ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN KUASA MUHYIDIN

KITA INGATKAN PADA PIMPINAN UMNO JANGAN SAMPAI ESOK DIHARI TUA KITA HABIS MASA PERBANYAKAN IBADAT MERERA DIHARI TUA SIBUK TURUN NAIK MAHKAMAH SILAP PERCATURAN MENGHABIS USIA TUA DI DALAM PAGAR BESI

KAMI TURUN TETAPI ATAS NAMA BERSIH :Nurul Izzah: Di mana tanggungjawab ‘Mahaguru’?

Nurul Izzah: Di mana tanggungjawab ‘Mahaguru’?
Wfauzdin

Kecewa dengan kenyataan Mahaguru Omardin. Apa perlu perjumpaan semua guru silat pada 2hb Julai ini.

Kami sebagai masyarakat silat tetap turun menyokong bersih sama seperti sumpah kami sebagai ahli silat memperjuangkan keadilan dan penipuan.

TENGKU RAZALEIGH SPEAKS -We need to rethink our economic policies

Dari Sakmongkol ak47

1. Malaysia's post-colonial history began with optimism and a grand hope in 1957. When Tunku Abdul Rahman, the first Prime Minister of Malaysia, proclaimed our Independence at the Merdeka Stadium in the unforgettable words that "Malaysia is a parliamentary democracy with an independent judiciary," he had a vision of a happy people in spite of the formidable economic problems we needed to solve. After that dawn of independence, there was a search of how we could achieve this happy society, Fulfilling the needs and aspirations of all Malaysians which was to continue for the Generations to come. He symbolized the concept and conviction of generational responsibility in his vision.

2. Tunku Abdul Rahman and his generation were dedicated leaders, not for power but a sense of duty to the present and the future. They were not in politics for the money or for themselves. Indeed, even after they had assumed power, they never used their position to benefit themselves or their families, nor did they build loyal cronies who would act as their financiers or hold any wealth unlawfully earned at the expense of the people.
3. The guiding philosophy was responsibility of public office. Public office was seen as a duty, not as an opportunity. The public office was also part of their sense of political commitment to create a Malaysia that was fair, just, cohesive, and balanced. This was combined by a deep conviction of generational responsibility for those who would come after them.

4. One of the greatest losses in public life and in politics today in Malaysia is that loss of generational responsibility. Everything seems to be surrounded by greed and the desire to be billionaires. This had led to a pyramid of cronies within the incumbent political parties and their associates in business. It is this combination of the hierarchy of political cronies and business cronies that led to the centralization of power in the incumbent political leadership and in the office of the Prime Minister.

5. This power in one individual allowed the manipulation of the political system; I mean by this the institutions of power including the media. In exchange for the centralization of power greed and self-interest was encouraged by example and in the guise of racial loyalty deserving rewards. This is the case in all the parties within the power structure. This state of affairs is one of the most dangerous and difficult to dismantle because there has been three decades of centralized power.

6. The political style that has dominated in these lost three decades has been "double-think" and "double-talk". One of the features which is alarming in this plan to maintain status quo is the encouragement covertly of racial and religious obscurantism. The underlying theme was a policy of using a balance of racialism and religion on the one hand and talks of unity on the other hand in order to make the people hostage to the status quo of power. As a result, racialism and racial concerns seem to have a grip on all aspects of our lives, in politics, economics, education and employment, irrespective of the present reality which has got nothing to do with race or religion. We are deliberately made to feel that we are hostage to these forces.

7. Freedom of speech and expression of our political concerns to change the atmosphere are restrained by how it will be interpreted by those who want to deny us the right to differ. Article 10 of the Constitution which guarantees this freedom is almost non-existence or subject to fear of retaliation or defamation. Legal suits intended to silence legitimate concerns of public responsibility are increasingly used. Unfortunately, our judicial system has forgotten the fundamental importance of Article 10 to the democratic life of Malaysia. Common sense seems to have been taken out of the law.

8. On the economic front, income inequality in Malaysia has widened. Some studies suggest that Malaysia's inequality is wider than Thailand's or Indonesia's. Historically, the concern was about ownership and control of the economy. It was the view of some that if ownership was de-racialized or balanced at the top, economic justice would follow. It is no longer a valid premise for the future. Income inequality is no longer a problem between races; it crosses the racial divide and it is a problem of the majority of Malaysians who feel the pressure of inflation in almost every essential aspect of their lives, challenging their wellbeing of themselves, their families, and their future. Today and the in the near future, this is the most serious challenge we face. It is not an easy challenge to overcome. It is a time when Malaysia needs leadership of the highest quality and of those who have the moral courage to change and re-think our economic policies.

9. It is in these circumstances that we face the serious problem of rising food prices, inflation in price of houses compounded by shortage in housing for the vast majority of young Malaysians. Lack of economic expansion to give all levels an opportunity to use their talents to seek work that is commensurate with their contribution, their needs of daily life, and to narrow the inequality gap, is the threat of the future. Therefore, we should be concerned about the justification of the removal of subsidies that affects the low income because that will further widen the inequality and open the society to social disorder and disintegration, and increase social in cohesion. It is in this context that I raise the issue about Independent Power Production Companies (IPP). The privatization contracts are today protected by the Official Secrets Act, and therefore we are unable to really know whether or not the public and PETRONAS, as trustees of the public, are directly or indirectly subsidizing these companies and the tycoons who are benefitting at the expense of the public.

10. Related to the question of the withdrawal of subsidies is the deficit that the Government suffers from in managing the economy. This question cannot be separated from the way that the Government has managed the nation's finances. If the deficit is as a result of wastage, corruption and extravagance in the use of public funds, then the solution to the problem should not be passed on to the public. What is needed is a reexamination of the management of the country's finances before taking any drastic steps that would affect the well-being of the people. We need to know the reality behind the apparent subsidies that are given to the public and its relationship in the totality of the management of the public finance. Only after we know the truth – and the whole truth – should any change in the policy of subsidies be implemented, as the consequences would have life-changing impact on the livelihood of the people. In the circumstances of rising inflation in food, stagnation of the economy and income, we should not do anything that would widen the disparity of income which would cause social instability. READ MORE.........

SISI GELAP RUSUHAN PEMINAT BOLA KELANTAN

Membaca tulisan berkaitan kerugian akibat rusuhan peminat bola Kelantan disini membuatkan teringat komen sahabat yang hadir ke Stadium menyasikan pertandingan akhir Piala Malaysia. Beliau yang amat teruja dengan kemenangan Negeri Sembilan memberi komen berkaitan kejadian rusuhan tersebut.

Dakwa beliau seolah macam dirancang keganasan tersebut untuk memberikan gambar burok rakyat Kelantan dibawah pemerintahan PAS. Seolah-olah nak maklumkan kepada rakyat ini lah negeri yang di perintah PAS mendakwa sebagai Serambi Mekah tetapi penduduknya perangai syaitan.

Beliau mendakwa walaupun di hari tersebut Kelantan sebagai tuanrumah diberi keistimewaan takan sampai penuntun 3 kali ganda dari N.Sembilan. Ini dimainkan pula akhbar yang mengwar-warkan Kelantan mempunyai peluang untuk menjadi juara dan mengakibatkan penyokong Kelantan menjadi teruja untuk hadir beraramai-ramai sehingga sanggup datang ke Seremban membeli tiket yang di peruntukan untuk penyokong N.Sembilan.

Disini pihak tertentu di persoalkan kerana ada penyokong PR yang hadir sama diketahui disiplinnya kerana biasa berada di dalam demo, takan kerana kalah sanggup mencederakan sesama penyokong kerana

1) Letupan mercun bermula dikawasan penyokong Kelantan sejak pukul 7.30 malam sehingga perlawanan tamat. Dimana pihak polis atau keselamatan ? Tidak kah mereka membuat pemerisaan dipintu masuk. Satu dua yang terlepas mungkin ada munasabahnya tetapi melihat dan mendengar bunyi letupan disepanjang perlawanan bukan satu bukan dua dan bukanya 100 mahupun 200 tetapi beribu mercun yang berjaya diseludup( dibenarkan) masuk ke stadium.

2) Kain rentang yang dibakar jatuh di bawah keatas penyokong Kelantan. Takan sanggup cederakan rakan sendiri. Patutnya penyokong N.Semblan yang diserang.

3) Kehadiran penyokong Kelantan yang mulut berbau minuman keras. Sah nya bukan ahli PAS. Kita masih ingat lagi sewaktu hadir di beberapa PRK antaranya di Bukit Gantang. Kita masih ingat lagi bila berhadapan dengan peraih undi dari Pemuda UMNO. Kita melihat perangai mereka yang terkinja-kinja meraih undi dibawah pengaruh Alkohol. Ini lah jenisnya antara yang ditemui didalam stadium. Seorang sahabat dari UMNO sebelum ini bercerita kepada penulis bahawa anak beliau merungut kerana bila berselisih dengan penyokong Kelantan(berdasar baju merah yang dipakai ) berbau minuman keras. Apatah lagi kita dimaklumkan pemuda UMNO banyak memberikan tiket serta pengangkutan percuma kepada ahli mereka untuk menyaksi pertandingan akhir ini.

Mungkin sahabat saya yang hadir silap sampai bola pun nak dipolitikkan. Tapi melihat rusuhan peminat Kelantan sebelum ini biasanya kepada penyokong pihak lawan atau pengadil. Tetapi yang menimbulkan keraguan mengapa kali ini antara sesama sendiri.

Mungkinkah ianya bukan penyokong Kelantan sendiri tetapi samseng2 yang diupah menyamar sebagai penyokong Kelantan oleh pihak tertentu yang berkepentingan dan menimbulkan huru-hara bagi memburuk Negeri Kelantan dibawah payung Tok Guru .

Mungkinkah ini yang berlaku????

Sedikit ulasan akhir sahabat saya . Malaysia Boleh. Satu kerusi stadium RM500 bro, Kah Kah Kah

TOPENG MUKA - BUKAN KAWALAN HARGA TETAPI DI BERI PERCUMA SESUAI DENGAN SLOGON 1MALAYSIA RAKYAT DIUTAMAKAN

Inilah masalahnya bila kuasa berada tangan mereka yang haprak. UBN haprak kita telah maklumkan diwaktu awal serangan selsema babi. Patutnya diterima saranan awal oleh PR kawalan di pintu masuk negara. Sekarang apa jadi pembawanya berkeliaran di seluruh negara. Itu masih anggap di tahap tak bahaya. Yang menjadi mangsa topeng muka.

Kawalan harga topeng dah terlewat dan tak munasabah. Dah lama pengedar buat duit. Manakala peruncit perlu jual secara runcit baru dapat untung yang banyak.

Sebelum selsema babi menyerang topeng muka 3 lapisan dijual pada harga RM1.00 dan tiada yang merungut. Sebelum ini harga impot dari negeri cina adalah RM5.00 untuk sekotak (50 helai setiap kotak). Yakni 10 sen sehelai. Pengimpot jual kepada pemborong RM12 sekotak. Kalau pengimpot itu juga pemborong dan pengedar maka ianya jauh lebih murah lagi. Kalau ianya dimpot sendiri oleh kerajaan lagi lah murah.

Sebelum dilanda selsema babi seseorang peniaga seperti farmasi hendak jual sekotak kadang-kadang mengambil masa 6 bulan. Malah ada pekedai terpaksa membuang sahaja apabila stok terlalu lama disimpan sehingga bertukar warna. Jadi bila serangan selsema babi makin meningkat dan arahan keperluan memakai dikeluarkan kepada sekolah maka permintaan meningkat dengan mendadak dan penjual mengambil peluang membuat untung segera.

Ketika itu di pasaran kekurangan topeng muka dirasai dan di mana pengedar kehabisan stok dan syarikat pengedar terpaksa meminjam dengan syarikat luar negara seperti dari Singapura. Bekalan di pasaran adalah stok lama. Kedengaran ada pengedar yang terlibat dengan kehilangan stok yang di hijack di dalam perjalanan untuk diserahkan kepada peruncit yang membuat tempahan.

Dikala itu dengan permintaan yang mendadak harga borong mula meningkat dan peruncit terpaksa membayar tunai jika mahukan stok. Disini lah mulanya harga runcit melambung naik sehingga dikhabar sehelai yang biasa RM0.50 ke RM1.00 kepada RM1.50 hingga RM5.00. Ianya di Seremban mungkin juga di negeri lain stok jenis bertali yang mudah digunakan oleh wanita islam yang bertudung langsung tiada dipasaran menyebabkan jika harga sehelai RM3.00 mahupun RM5.oo tetap dibeli kerana kesedaran rakyat demi kesihatan mereka sanggup berbelanja.

Semuanya terjadi kerana kelewatan kerajaan memberikan saranan awal untuk berjaga-jaga kepada rakyat . Arahan yang tiba-tiba bila angka kematian makin meningkat menyebabkan pihak kapitalis cuba membuat untung segera.

Kawalan harga serta tindakan penguatkuasaan kepada harga topeng buat masa tidak akan mampu mengawal tindakan kapitalis ini. Ini kerana bekalan topeng dipasaran memang tiada kerana stok yang berlegar dipasaran adalah stok yang dikilang 6 bulan dahulu.

Bila pakar dan kerajaan menyatakan serangan selsema kali kedua bakal melanda pada oktober nanti menyebabkan pihak pengedar dan penjual akan menyorokan dan tidak mahu menjual kerana permintaan yang bakal meningkat nanti pasti memberikan untung yang lumayan.

Hanya pengimpot, pengedar dan pekilang sahaja yang tahu bila bekalan baru akan berada dipasaran yang kita jangka 2 atau 3 bulan lagi.

Jadi kawalan harga bukan kaedah terbaik kerana ianya akan berlaku panic dipasaran. Kaedah terbaik kerajaan sendiri mengawal pasaran bekalan topeng. Ianya adalah nilai yang amat kecil jika kerajaan membekalkan percuma kepada rakyat. Cukup kalau tidak kepada semua tetapi kepada hospital serta pelajar sekolah yang akan membuatkan keseimbangan permintaan dipasaran seterusnya harga pasaran di stabilkan .

Semuanya boleh jika kerajaan mempunyai keazaman politik (political will ) yang tinggi bila mana 1 Malaysia rakyat didahulukan bukan 1 Malaysia Koperat didahulukan.